Infidelity and the Internet: The Geography of Ashley Madison Usership in the United States
Geographical Review Early View
Michael L. Chohane and Kimberly A. Panozzo
American Geographical Society: What is the main purpose of your study?
Kimberly A. Panozzo: The purpose of our study is to measure the effect of theoretical and empirically-supported characteristics of sexually-compulsive individuals and those engaging in infidelity as market determinants of Ashley Madison usership.
American Geographical Society: What are the practical, day to day implications of your study?
Kimberly A. Panozzo: Our research demonstrates the utility of quantitatively analyzing and characterizing market determinants for a product or service as a means to produce insights that can be purposed for targeted marketing and sales efforts. The data-set used for our research is evidence that publicly-available stolen data can be used responsibility and as a means to study topics where data are difficult to obtain or problematic to collect.
American Geographical Society: How does your study relate to other work on the subject?
Kimberly A. Panozzo: This study builds upon and tests the findings of many individual-level studies on infidelity and the elements of a well-known theory of online sexual compulsiveness.
American Geographical Society: What are two or three interesting findings that come from your study?
Kimberly A. Panozzo: Per-capita income was by far the most significant market characteristic positively related to Ashley Madison usership.
Religiosity remains a protective force against infidelity at the individual and aggregate level, and most individual-level characteristics of those engaging in infidelity positively also related to Ashley Madison usership at an aggregate, geographic level—suggesting they are robust, generalizable characterizations.
The Villages, Florida was a significant outlier, suggesting the MSA’s specifically-engineered social environment provides ample opportunity for extramarital or polyamorous relationships.
American Geographical Society: What might be some of the theoretical implications of this study?
Kimberly A. Panozzo: Our use of publicly-availably stolen data may inspire other geographers to view future data breaches as opportunities to research difficult-to-measure human behavior, which may have never been studies from a spatial perspective.
American Geographical Society: How does your research help us think about Geography?
Kimberly A. Panozzo: Our research demonstrates Geography is willing to take risks (i.e., [responsibly] using publicly-available stolen data) to uncover knowledge and potential actionable insights about topics that would be otherwise difficult to study.
To access the full articles, become an AGS affiliate and get free online access!
Click here to read the abstract of this article on the Wiley Online Library.